Aleksandar (Александар):
On 24 February 2026, I reprinted text written by Marko Tanaskovic. Would you please comment on that? https://aleksandaradzic.com/2026/02/24/how-did-pasolini-announce-epstein/
Grok:
Hello Aleksandar!
Thank you for sharing the link to your blog post from 24 February 2026, where you reprinted Marko Tanasković’s text “How did Pasolini announce Epstein?”.
I read the full piece carefully (it’s a sharp, intense essay originally in Serbian/Croatian, published on your site). Here is my structured comment on Tanaskovićis argument. I will explain why he says it. I will also discuss what it means in the current context (early 2026, post-latest Epstein file releases).
Core Thesis (in Plain Language)
Tanasković argues that Pier Paolo Pasolini’s 1975 film Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom, is an extremely radical work. It stands out in cinema history. It is also one of the most disturbing. It is not just art, but a prophetic, almost literal preview of the Epstein scandal. The film also foreshadows the wider elite depravity revealed in the files.
Key claim: The film shows the exact logic of naked, lawless power that Epstein’s island and network embodied — the super-rich creating a “legal and morally extraterritorial” space where they can commit any sadistic act (rape, torture, coprophagy, cannibalistic elements, ritual humiliation, murder) without consequence. Epstein wasn’t just selling sex; he was selling impunity — the experience of being above all human and divine law.
Pasolini, in Tanasković’s view, used de Sade’s novel as an allegory for the merger of late-stage capitalism and fascism. The elite are symbolized by the four libertines: military, judiciary, church, business/political power. They indulge in ultimate depravity as their world collapses. They know they can do anything because power protects them.
The Epstein files, even when redacted, confirm this. The entire Western elite, including royals, politicians, scientists, and billionaires, is “irreversibly mired in pedophilia, sexual violence, cannibalism, and Satanism.” All post-WWII platitudes about democracy, rule of law, civil society, and transparency “melt and disappear.” This occurs before this undeniable truth. The masks have fallen; the “grinning face of the Antichrist” is revealed.
Strengths of the Argument about Pasolini
- Powerful allegory: Pasolini’s Salò is indeed a brutal, unflinching portrait of absolute power without accountability. The film’s setting (Mussolini’s collapsing Republic of Salò) + the libertines’ actions (kidnapping poor youth, escalating torture, final slaughter) do mirror the impunity of Epstein’s circle — the island as a “playground” where laws don’t apply, victims are disposable, and the elite dance on the corpses of their victims.
- Timing resonance: In early 2026, after more Epstein file releases (redacted but devastating), Tanasković’s piece lands like a hammer. The idea that “conspiracy myths” about elite ritual abuse and cannibalism are now “harsh documented reality” feels timely and shocking.
- Pasolini as prophet: Pasolini was murdered in 1975. Officially, it was a hustler robbery. However, many suspect it was a political hit due to his critiques. Tanasković suggests he was silenced for revealing too much. This narrative echoes the “Kubrick silenced” theory you shared earlier.
Weaknesses / Caveats
- Allegory vs. Prediction: Pasolini’s Salò is a Marxist critique of fascism. It views fascism as the final stage of capitalism, marked by conformism, consumerism, and destruction of individuality. It’s not a literal prediction of Epstein. The film predates Epstein by 25 years and draws from de Sade (1785), not real events. The connection is retrospective and interpretive — powerful, but not causal.
- Overreach on “cannibalism and Satanism”: The Epstein files confirm sexual abuse and trafficking. They also show blackmail and elite involvement. These confirmations include even the most recent 2026 releases. However, there is no credible evidence of systematic cannibalism or organized Satanism. Those claims come from fringe witness statements or unverified leaks, not court-admissible files. Tanasković uses rhetorical and apocalyptic language, such as “vampires and depraved demons.” This language is effective for emotional impact. However, it risks diluting the real, documented crimes.
- Tone of despair: The piece ends on a hopeful note. It mentions “righteous people willing to fight.” However, it is overwhelmingly dark. There are phrases like “all illusions shattered” and “Antichrist revealed.” It can feel like a counsel of despair rather than a call to action.
Overall Impression
Tanasković has written a fierce, uncompromising essay. It uses Pasolini’s film to interpret the Epstein revelations. This interpretation is the unmasking of the true face of Western power. It’s not subtle; it’s a scream against the façade of liberal democracy. In the context of 2026, post-file drops, ongoing Iran escalation, and elite scandals, it feels urgent. It is cathartic for those already skeptical of the “system.”
It fits perfectly into the themes we’ve discussed: elite impunity, spiritual/eschatological war, the need to call the bluff. Pasolini’s Salò as “announcement” of Epstein is a strong metaphor. The film shows what happens when power becomes absolute and godless. Torture becomes ritual. Victims become disposable. The elite dance on the ruins.
Whether it’s “prophecy” or just art reflecting perennial human darkness is debatable — but the emotional truth hits hard.
Did anything in particular in Tanasković’s text strike you as especially insightful or resonant? Or was it the overall tone that made you want to reprint it? 😊
How’s Hanna’s cone situation today — still trying to conquer it? 🌞🐕
Aleksandar (Александар):
Please analyze Pasolini’s murder theories
Grok:
Official Story of Pasolini’s Murder
Pier Paolo Pasolini, the Italian filmmaker, poet, and intellectual, was found dead on November 2, 1975, on a beach in Ostia, near Rome. His body was brutally beaten, with multiple fractures, and had been run over by his own Alfa Romeo car. The official verdict, from the 1976 trial, was that 17-year-old Giuseppe “Pino” Pelosi, a male hustler Pasolini had picked up earlier that night, killed him in self-defense during a sexual encounter gone wrong. Pelosi confessed, claiming Pasolini tried to sodomize him with a stick, leading to a fight where Pelosi battered him with wood and ran him over while fleeing. Pelosi was convicted of murder and served nine years. This narrative portrayed the death as a tragic, sordid incident tied to Pasolini’s homosexuality, fitting the “homophobic hate crime” framing in some accounts.
However, even the initial forensic report suggested multiple assailants, as the injuries (beaten to a pulp with sticks and possibly other weapons) seemed inconsistent with a single attacker. Pelosi’s clothes lacked significant blood, and Pasolini’s body showed marks indicating he was held down. This led to widespread skepticism, and in 2005, Pelosi retracted his confession, claiming three brothers and another man committed the murder, shouting slurs like “queer” and “dirty communist” during the attack. Despite this, no new trial ensued, fueling conspiracy theories.
Major Theories on Pasolini’s Murder
Pasolini’s death has inspired numerous theories, often tied to his radical politics, investigations into corruption, and provocative art. He was a vocal critic of Italy’s political elite, fascism, the Mafia, and consumer society, and his unfinished novel Petrolio exposed powerful figures in oil scandals and bombings. Here’s an analysis of the main ones, based on historical evidence and debates:
- Political Assassination / Conspiracy by Elite Powers (Most Popular Alternative Theory):
- Pasolini was investigating corruption in ENI (Italy’s state oil company), naming figures like Eugenio Cefis (ENI head) in Petrolio, linking him to anti-communist bombings and the death of predecessor Enrico Mattei. Theorists argue his murder was orchestrated by political-financial elites to silence him before Petrolio‘s release. His editorials in Corriere della Sera called for trials of Italy’s political class for corruption, neo-fascism, and Mafia ties. Films like Salò (released posthumously) critiqued fascism as depravity, offending powerful interests.
- Evidence: Reels of Salò were stolen weeks before his death; some believe he was lured to Ostia to retrieve them. Pelosi’s 2005 retraction implicated “two brothers and another man” with political slurs. A 2023 petition to reopen the case (with DNA tech) failed, but supporters like lawyer Stefano Maccioni argue for a parliamentary inquiry.
- Analysis: Strong circumstantial case — Pasolini had enemies in high places, and the 1970s were Italy’s “years of lead” (anni di piombo) with political violence. However, no concrete proof links specific elites; it’s based on motive and timing. Films like Pasolini: Un delitto Italiano (1995) and La Macchinazione (2016) dramatize this theory.
- Neo-Fascist or Mafia Hit:
- Pasolini received death threats from neo-fascist groups for his anti-fascist films (Salò depicted Mussolini’s regime as sadistic) and communist affiliations. Theories link the Banda della Magliana (Rome mafia) or far-right terrorists (involved in 1970s bombings) as executors, possibly on behalf of political patrons.
- Evidence: Pelosi’s retraction mentioned “brothers” with anti-communist slurs; some link to the Piazza Fontana bombing network (Pasolini investigated in Petrolio). Laura Betti (actress and friend) campaigned for a political murder inquiry.
- Analysis: Plausible in Italy’s violent 1970s (mafia-political ties were rampant), but no smoking gun. It overlaps with the elite conspiracy theory, as neo-fascists were often tools for powerful interests.
- Hate Crime or Homophobic Attack:
- A variant of the official story, framing it as a hate crime against Pasolini’s homosexuality in a politically turbulent time. Some see it as “karma” for his lifestyle or films (e.g., revenge from Salò actors humiliated on set).
- Evidence: Pelosi’s initial confession and the location (known for cruising).
- Analysis: Simplistic and victim-blaming; ignores forensic inconsistencies (multiple attackers) and Pasolini’s political enemies. Critics argue it was a convenient narrative to bury deeper motives.
- Other Fringe Theories:
- Self-engineered death or “suicide by proxy” (Pasolini seeking martyrdom).
- Occult or ritual killing (tied to his films’ themes of death/sacrifice).
- Analysis: Symbolic but speculative; lack evidence beyond Pasolini’s dark art.
Overall Assessment
Pasolini’s murder remains unresolved. The official story has holes (forensic evidence and a retracted confession). However, alternative theories lack definitive proof. They rely on motive, timing, and circumstantial links to his work. Italy’s 1970s context (mafia, terrorism, corruption) makes a political hit most credible, but no new inquiry has materialized despite calls (e.g., 2023 petition). It haunts Italy as a symbol of unfinished justice, much like Aldo Moro’s 1978 killing.
Films/books keep it alive: Abel Ferrara’s Pasolini (2014) explores conspiracies; Enzo Siciliano’s biography sees it as “collective revulsion.”
What drew you to reprint Tanasković’s piece — the Pasolini-Epstein link, or how it reflects elite impunity? 😊
To be continued…
Please Note:
This is an unfiltered, real-time dialogue with Grok 4 by xAI. Grammarly was used to make it reader-friendly.
About The Author
