British unsuccessful attempt to declare Srebrenica massacre a genocide – Cover up for British role
Widely ignored official reports and never-before-seen declassified files suggest shadowy British special forces operatives played a crucial role in Srebrenica – one of the 20th century’s most notorious and controversial massacres.
The following article was written by
KIT KLARENBERG·DECEMBER 27, 2023
I will publish parts of that article here. The link to the original article will be provided at the bottom of this post.
In July 2023, few media observers took notice when influential British intelligence operative-turned-lawmaker Alicia Kearns issued a public call for Western boots on the ground in the former Yugoslavia.
Addressing a packed session of the House of Commons, Foreign Affairs Committee chair Kearns made the alarming call: “I…urge the Government: let us rejoin EUFOR, let us commit NATO peacekeepers to Brčko district, let us transition to a NATO-led peacekeeping mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina.”
The incendiary comments came during a parliamentary debate on Srebrenica Memorial Week, which commemorates the massacre of Muslim men and boys in Srebrenica by the Army of Republika Srpska (VRS), in July 1995.
Grave crimes were subsequently committed there, many of which remain unpunished. Yet three decades later, details of what happened that fateful month, including the total number of people killed and the exact nature of their deaths, remain uncertain. Whether the horror constituted genocide also remains a point of contention among legal scholars.
Nonetheless, Western leaders have frequently invoked the event to justify illegal military interventions. Bombing campaigns targeting troublesome countries across the Global South are frequently framed as righteous actions, concerned with preventing ‘another Srebrenica.’ For notoriously hawkish USAID administrator Samantha Power, this objective became the cornerstone of an insidious brand of liberal interventionism which has come to be known as “Responsibility to Protect.”
British are the only country other than Bosnia & Hercegovina to officially commemorate killings in Srebrenica as an act of genocide
But the exploitation of Srebrenica to justify further warfare is not limited to Washington. British officials are particularly keen promoters of this argument, with the hawkish intelligence operative turned parliamentarian Alicia Kearns providing the latest example. Today, Britain is the only country other than Bosnia and Herzegovina to officially commemorate the killings an act of genocide. Since the late 1990s, London has also been home to many NGOs that have promoted the claim that Srebrenica constituted an act of genocide.
However, in all the memorializing of the tragic events of July 1995 by British journalists, pundits and politicians, the presence of the SAS in the area at the time has stubbornly remained an open, unexplored secret.
Declassified British Ministry of Defence files reviewed by The Grayzone raise disturbing questions about London’s clandestine role in Srebrenica, such as how and why the MI6 knew an attack on the enclave was forthcoming before the VRS even planned it. Today, British citizens and residents of Bosnia still demand answers.
SAS in Bosnia ‘could cause World War III
Seven years later, the Dutch government published its official investigation of the failure of its peacekeeping force to protect Srebrenica, which was compiled by the Netherlands Institute for War Documentation (NIOD). Six days after the release of the findings, Prime Minister Wim Kok stepped down. The Netherlands ultimately accepted partial political responsibility for the massacre after the country’s Supreme Court declared the Dutch government bore 10% of the liability for the incident.
Are you surprised that the Kingdom of Genocides parading as the UK is so keen to accuse Serbs of genocide? I am not. In the sick minds of those serving satanists and vampires in that country’s castles, it is the best way to hide their genocides. Do they really think that world will forget about British genocides in North America, Australia and parts of Asia and Africa? Yes, they do. They have a good reason for that too. It is because Anglophone hegemon control all news media with the global reach. Therefore, they control what is presented as “truth”. Are they successful in that? I am glad to report that levels of their credibility are reaching the lowest levels ever.
Aleksandar Adzic




