NATO failed war against Serbia – Who really won the 1999 NATO war on Serbia?

According to the Serbian Fifth Column parading as the pro-Western (or Liberal) opposition, Serbia lost the war against NATO aggression in 1999. However, that is effectively not true. Here is the simple explanation of that: If Serbia accepted Rambouillet Agreement which was an ultimatum by NATO then Kosovo & Metohija would become independent three years later. However, the NATO aggression against Serbia was effectively ended by UNSC Resolution 1244 which recognised territorial integrity of Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (made of Serbia and Montenegro). That means that Kosovo & Metohija are part of Serbia and that level of its autonomy will be negotiated in the future.

How do you define “success”? NATO’s ultimate goal was to separate Kosovo & Metohija from Serbia and make it into an independent country and a member of the UN. The same was achieved through several civil wars in Yugoslavia. All former states of Yugoslavia are independent states today. Is Kosovo an independent state today? Is it a member of the UN? The ultimate goal of Serbia’s defending itself from NATO aggression was to preserve its territorial integrity. Regardless of some countries recognising Kosovo as an independent state (less than 50% of the UN members), Kosovo is not an independent country and, therefore, not a member of the UN.

The UN and most members recognise Kosovo & Metohija as part of Serbia. Now, you tell me who won the 1999 NATO war on Serbia.

Destabilising Serbia – Colour “revolution” on October 5, 2000

Before I continue, we need to clarify one thing that many experts and commentators fail to mention regarding all “colour revolutions”. What is it? In my opinion, the main reason for the “success” of these revolutions is the very long preparation through the exhaustion of the general population (economic sanctions and a series of small political protests). Number of “protesters” is usually steady. However, the aim is to maximise the “quiet majority”. Another critical point is controlling some government services (police, military and intelligence). That is achieved through the lengthy process of recruitment by intelligence services. The methods are corruption, blackmail and direct threats.

If the above is correct, then all “regimes” that are under threat by Anglo-Zionist hegemon and subordinated Euro-Nazi-Satanists should give up on trying to please the “Western factor” by inaction. Otherwise, it will be just a matter of time before all required elements for successful regime change are reached. The rest will be an (ugly) history.

Destabilising Serbia started in 1991 if not earlier. Early stages of destroying Yugoslavia were not initiated by Anglo-Zionist hegemon. It was one of their Euro-Nazi-Satanists that pushed strongly for that. It was Germany. One detail regarding recognition of Croatia as independent from Yugoslavia is revealing. It shows how deep and how far back in time goes Euro-Nazi organisation:

Ukraine and Latvia were the first to react by recognising Croatian independence in the second week of December. The following week, Iceland and Germany recognised it, on 19 December 1991, as the first Western European countries to do so.

Google Search

Vatican and Comintern (Communist International) vs Serbs & Russians

Yugoslavia and the USSR were built on the blood and bones of Serbian and Russian peoples. Communists perceived Serbs as the biggest threat to their rule after taking over Yugoslavia in 1945. Exactly the same treatment was given to Russians in the USSR after the October Revolution in 1917. Vatican used it power and resources to use religion to undermine Eastern Orthodox Serbs and Russians.

There were two main “Others” against which Yugoslav socialism tried to construct itself, one related to the past and the other to the present. The party invented the first before 1948. and the other after 1948. Both were then preserved as “Others” until the end of Yugoslav socialism in the late 1980s. These were (1) pre-war Yugoslavism, based on the concept of South Slavism, which in ideological terms was a form of liberal, i.e. representative democracy; The second one was the Soviet flavour of communism (socialism).

Interwar (1917 – 1941) Yugoslavia was based on its ethnic, i.e. South Slavic character. It was a country of all the South Slavs, in which three recognized “tribal” groups (Serbs, Croats and Slovenes) were supposed to become one Yugoslav nation. Yugoslavia was to create a Yugoslav nation, primarily in a political, but also in an ethnic sense. Vatican used religion to keep Orthodox Serbs separate from Croats and Slovenes who are Catholics. This is best explained by Independent State Croatia policy of: One-third of the Serbs were to be killed; One-third of the Serbs were to be expelled; One-third of the Serbs were to be forcibly converted to Catholicism.

The new, socialist Yugoslavia was, from its beginning, constructed as the opposite of all this. Firstly, it was a republic, not a monarchy, a federation, not a unitary state. Secondly, it did not seek to construct a Yugoslav nation nor aimed to build up a Yugoslav nation-state.

Socialist Yugoslav ideologues led by Edvard Kardelj identified “unitarism” as one of its prime enemies. Why? Yugoslavia was formed after WWI, in which Serbia played a significant role in the defeat of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Serbian King Aleksandar I had two choices after finishing the war on a winning side: 1. To unify all Serbs in one country (wrongly called “Greater Serbia”); 2. To unify Southern Slavs in one country – Yugoslavia (Yugo = jug = south/southern). Unfortunately for Serbs, he chose option two despite being Serb himself.

Communists created internal borders of Yugoslavia in 1945 with one goal. It was to separate Serbs in as many different states as possible. Serbs were a significant part of the total population in Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia & Hercegovina and Croatia. I will not go to explaining efforts to create new nations (Montenegrin and Muslim) and even new churches (Macedonian Orthodox Church) by Yugoslav communists. For Yugoslav communists, fighting against “unitarism” was keeping Serbs in separate states. This played a significant role in the final destruction of Yugoslavia and attempts to destroy Serbia by separating it into several regions (Kosovo & Metohija, Sandzak and Vojvodina). These attempts are ongoing as I type this.

I will continue with this article after making a small break here. If you are reading this sentence, I owe you my gratitude for reading this far.


Discover more from Aleksandar Adzic

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

One response to “New German role in destabilising Serbia 2”

  1. […] Categories My ScribblingsTags Global-agenda, My-view Post navigation Genocide by Anglo-Zion – New massacreNew German role in destabilising Serbia 2 […]

    Like

Trending